Disgruntled investors are going after Wall Street once again, this time accusing one of investment bank Morgan-Stanley's high-tech mutual funds of making biased stock picks. Recent lawsuits allege the Morgan Stanley Technology fund was influenced to
Advertisement
Disgruntled investors are going after Wall Street once again, this time accusing one of investment bank Morgan-Stanley's high-tech mutual funds of making biased stock picks.
Recent lawsuits allege the Morgan Stanley Technology fund was influenced to buy and hold stocks of companies that delivered huge investment banking fees or could potentially bring big business to the investment bank.
According to the lawsuits, the Morgan Stanley fund followed the biased recommendations of the firms analysts decisions that have cost shareholders millions of dollars since the portfolios October 2000 inception.
The fund lost 48 percent in 2001 and was down another 50 percent during the first nine months of 2002. While Morgan Stanley strongly denied the allegations, I fail to see how the management of the fund is somehow distinct from the other divisions of Morgan Stanley. Ultimately, they all work for the same boss.
The suits further claim that the tech fund failed to disclose that the firm had investment banking ties with a number of companies whose stocks were part of the portfolio. They also failed to reveal that those links could affect the funds buy or sell calls.
Why bring all this up? For one thing, it is interesting to note that Morgan Stanley offered four of these types of funds in October 2000. Just around the time when we sold all of our positions (Oct. 13, 2000) and it became clear, at least to those of us who were tracking long-term trends, that a major trend change had taken place.
More recently in the news its been Merrill Lynch who had a questionable deal involving transactions with failed energy trader Enron. Of course, the financial services industry regulates itself so well, that an $80 million payment to the SEC is sufficient to wrap up this case without admitting or denying wrongdoing.
Whats the moral of this story? While it is impossible to predict these alleged conflict of interest schemes, it is definitely possible to follow a disciplined approach and be on the right side of the market so you can avoid jumping aboard a sinking ship.
About the Author
Ulli Niemann is an investment advisor and has been writing about objective, methodical approaches to investing for over 10 years. He eluded the bear market of 2000 and has helped countless people make better investment decisions. To find out more about his approach and his FREE Newsletter, please visit: www.successful-investment.com.
Article Directory: http://www.articlerich.com
Inheritance tax is not one of those topics that people like to talk about all that much. Which is understandable really. However, changing rules on wh...
Within the financial service industry, it is a well known fact that the majority of so-called financial advisors and planners are not sophisticated in...
Whilst I can see no real reasons for buying Sterling it has to be admitted that the precipitous fall over the last few months might be rather an over ...
Money is very the key to survive the retirement years without any glitches and financial issues. That said there are very few folks who start to inves...
Well, here it is again, that time of year when we all seem to panic for some reason. The time when we all start running around the office screaming, '...